Posted Apr 14, 2008 22:32 UTC (Mon) by cathectic (subscriber, #40543)
In reply to: Correction by andikleen
Parent article: My kid hates Linux (ZDNet)
This is not correct either - there is no official Slackware x86-64 port;
the only official Slackware is the 32 bit x86 build, or the Slack/390
port.
Anything else is unofficial and not Slackware (although we do try very
hard to be Slack like). So technically, Slackware doesn't do multilib (and
Pat Volkerding has stated in interviews in the past that any such official
port would likely not be multilib anyway, so you would be right on that
front); but then again, Slackware doesn't do x86-64 either at the moment
either.
(I should state for the record here that I am a Slamd64 contributor).
Posted Apr 16, 2008 22:11 UTC (Wed) by pr1268 (subscriber, #24648)
[Link]
Well, I think Andikleen is partially correct: While not supported by Slackware's own development team (i.e. Patrick Volkerding et al), the Slamd64 distribution is otherwise a 64-bit clone of Slackware.