Poor devils?

Poor devils?

Posted Apr 10, 2008 23:40 UTC (Thu) by pr1268 (subscriber, #24648)
In reply to: Mickos, As New Sun Exec: Linux Will Stay In LAMP (InformationWeek) by einstein
Parent article: Mickos, As New Sun Exec: Linux Will Stay In LAMP (InformationWeek)

Just curious, to whom are you referring to when you mention "poor devils"?

AFAIK you can currently run Windows on an x86 architecture inside a virtual machine in Linux, so it seems Sun's white paper is making a redundant statement.

Different topic: Did anyone notice the troll-like comment from username "TIM" on the InformationWeek article? Quote:

What's with you guys freaks of Linux's???? Linux is nothing to me!!! Even if the world embrace LINUX I guartee you that I WILL NEVER GO THAT WAY [sic].

Fine. With an attitude like that, Linux users don't want you coming this way, either.

---

(Log in to post comments)

> Just curious, to whom are you referring to when you mention "poor devils"?

I was referring to the "they" in the sentence just above my statement. In other words, Sun.

Their current position, wherein they are playing nicely with microsoft, reminds me of a
similar situation with SGI, who once owned the high end desktop. They also fell on hard times,
and flirted with microsoft. a sad story indeed.

> Did anyone notice the troll-like comment from username "TIM" on the InformationWeek article?

I suspect that's probably a parody...