| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
It's more than GCCIt's more than GCCPosted Apr 7, 2008 14:55 UTC (Mon) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: It's more than GCC by coriordan Parent article: Sun Microsystems' Next Linux Move (Seeking Alpha)
glibc is replaceable by uClibc. uClibc lacks some important things glibc has got (most notably the binary compatibility commitment), but is still perfectly *usable* (well, it supports most of POSIX by now, at least the parts people actually use).
(Log in to post comments)
It's more than GCC Posted Apr 7, 2008 15:39 UTC (Mon) by coriordan (guest, #7544) [Link] That, as Mr. Clinton will agree, depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is. I mean, sure, it *is* possible in a post to an LWN story. But where're the uClibc based distros? And I don't mean toy projects, unused experiments. /coriordan smokes a cigar
It's more than GCC Posted Apr 7, 2008 18:05 UTC (Mon) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] Well, I know my systems wouldn't boot without it (it's damn useful as a libc in an initramfs: klibc is too small to handle a lot of stuff you might reasonably put in there, but uClibc happens just fine).
|
|
||||||||||||