It isn't a "low blow" to honestly state that Debian has not followed good procedure. You could
tell from the bug report yourself that it had been forwarded to a single developer and not a
security group contact and you never bothered to check with us to coordinate a release.
So yes, if you follow good procedure in future than you are not likely to be criticised.
Posted Apr 4, 2008 2:10 UTC (Fri) by abartlet (subscriber, #3928)
[Link]
It is to do so in the release announcement. Leave such things for a private (or at least not
in the announce mail) discussion with the debian maintainer.
OpenSSH 5.0 released
Posted Apr 4, 2008 4:06 UTC (Fri) by micah (subscriber, #20908)
[Link]
Its a hard claim to accept that Debian didn't follow good procedure when the bug was reported
in a public forum and existed there for nearly 3 months for all the internet to see. If this
bug was reported via private channels such as vendor-sec and then Debian went about releasing
it to the world anyways, then yes you would be right, but once its out there, its out there.
I'm sorry, but there is no undo on the internet.
OpenSSH 5.0 released
Posted Apr 14, 2008 18:02 UTC (Mon) by shane (subscriber, #3335)
[Link]
To be fair, there are a lot of public forums on the Internet. Every distribution has one, and software developers do not have the time to follow every single possible channel for bug reports.
Normal procedure is for distributions to push bug reports and other patches upstream to the main developers. In my experience distributions tend to be pretty bad about this process, and maybe frustration with this has contributed to the asinine actions from the OpenSSH developers.
OpenSSH 5.0 released
Posted Apr 4, 2008 6:36 UTC (Fri) by bronson (subscriber, #4806)
[Link]
Wow, two of the first three paragraphs of that press release are spent complaining about
Debian. Tell us more about good procedure? Especially as related to discrete communication?
:)
OpenSSH 5.0 released
Posted Apr 10, 2008 10:55 UTC (Thu) by daniels (subscriber, #16193)
[Link]
Wow, what an incentive. 'Don't make any mistake ever, and we won't spend our entire release
announcement calling you idiots.' Your generosity is matched only by your kindness.
(Of course, Novell employees are idiots when they make a typo introducing one security bug,
but whoever made this mistake is doubtless not an idiot.)