| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Lawsuits might be pointed the other wayLawsuits might be pointed the other wayPosted Mar 31, 2008 6:42 UTC (Mon) by yodermk (subscriber, #3803)In reply to: Lawsuits might be pointed the other way by dark Parent article: A creative example of the value of free drivers
I doubt it. A "business decision" does not legally negate that the features were advertised to work with XP.
(Log in to post comments)
Lawsuits might be pointed the other way Posted Mar 31, 2008 9:39 UTC (Mon) by jamesh (subscriber, #1159) [Link] I wouldn't be surprised if they just advertised the features and listed "minimum system requirements". I doubt they'd advertise a card as supporting exactly one version of Windows.
Lawsuits might be pointed the other way Posted Mar 31, 2008 11:21 UTC (Mon) by khim (subscriber, #9252) [Link] I doubt they'd advertise a card as supporting exactly one version of Windows. Why not? How is it different from supporting exactly one OS?
|
|
||||||||||||