Clarke had it taking a million years in _The City and the Stars_. It seems
like we might manage the no-moving-parts dictum, in computers at least, a
good bit sooner than that.
(I definitely agree with that dictum: `no machine shall contain any moving
parts.' As a recipe for long-lived hardware, it has few equals.)
Posted Mar 29, 2008 2:00 UTC (Sat) by zlynx (subscriber, #2285)
[Link]
Even with zero moving parts, thermal migration of the material on the silicon will limit the
life of a computer system.
Solid state disk: show me
Posted Mar 29, 2008 13:21 UTC (Sat) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
Yeah, but it's *better*. ;}
(now the fix-every-atom-in-place, fix-reality-to-a-virtual-backdrop tech
they had in Diaspar, *that* was advanced. And probably physically
impossible, but it feels like it should have worked. Ah, Clarke wrote some
good stuff in his day.)