| |||||||||||||
Could allow inclusion of systrace?Could allow inclusion of systrace?Posted Mar 26, 2008 15:38 UTC (Wed) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: Could allow inclusion of systrace? by oak Parent article: The return of authoritative hooks
You mean Roland McGrath's utrace? While incredibly nifty and a long-overdue revamp of the awful ptrace() interface, utrace hasn't been designed as a security enforcement mechanism either :) (however, things like UML are in effect using it as such in any case, so security-hole-inducing bugs in ptrace() *are* likely to get fixed.)
(Log in to post comments)
Could allow inclusion of systrace? Posted Mar 26, 2008 18:52 UTC (Wed) by oak (subscriber, #2786) [Link] > You mean Roland McGrath's utrace? Sorry, yes. I noticed that first/early patch(es) of it have gone to 2.6.25. > (however, things like UML are in effect using it as such in any case, so security-hole-inducing bugs in ptrace() *are* likely to get fixed.) Sounds promising. :-)
|
|||||||||||||