| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Commercial GPL?Commercial GPL?Posted Mar 25, 2008 5:41 UTC (Tue) by Max.Hyre (subscriber, #1054)In reply to: Tackling proliferation by man_ls Parent article: Bruce Perens and the OSI board Just what is a ``commercial GPL''? What is its intent? I've read the MPL a time or two, but my eyes glazed over. I'd appreciate a brief ``compare and contrast'' of the MPL vs. the GPLv2. Thanks.
(Log in to post comments)
Commercial GPL? Posted Mar 25, 2008 6:09 UTC (Tue) by BrucePerens (subscriber, #2510) [Link] As far as I can tell, LGPL3 achieves all of its goals. Allow software to be linked into proprietary works and still remain free on a file-by-file basis.Bruce
|
|
||||||||||||