Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/3] PM: New suspend and hibernation callbacks for PCI bus type [LWN.net]

From:		Greg KH <greg-AT-kroah.com>
To:		"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-AT-sisk.pl>
Subject:		Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/3] PM: New suspend and hibernation callbacks for PCI bus type
Date:		Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:06:35 -0700
Message-ID:		<20080319180635.GA5296@kroah.com>
Cc:		LKML <linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi-AT-vger.kernel.org>, pm list <linux-pm-AT-lists.linux-foundation.org>, Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy-AT-suse.de>
Archive-link:		Article, Thread

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 02:24:48PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 19 of March 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:25:15AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > > 
> > > Implement new suspend and hibernation callbacks for the PCI busi type.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/pci/pci-driver.c |  497 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > >  include/linux/pci.h      |    2 
> > >  2 files changed, 453 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Hm, that's a lot of code added.  What additional functionality did we
> > just get?
> 
> The possibility to handle suspend/hibernation in a more flexible way, provided
> that the drivers define the new callbacks.

So, we're going to have to now convert all drivers, right?  Nice, I can
always use a bump up in the "number of patches submited" numbers :)

thanks,

greg k-h

(Log in to post comments)