| |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
Plan for voting machine probe dropped after lawsuit threat (nj.com)Plan for voting machine probe dropped after lawsuit threat (nj.com)Posted Mar 19, 2008 16:05 UTC (Wed) by JoeBuck (subscriber, #2330)In reply to: Plan for voting machine probe dropped after lawsuit threat (nj.com) by Los__D Parent article: Plan for voting machine probe dropped after lawsuit threat (nj.com) Agreed: if the supplier will not agree to allow independent testing of its products, those products cannot be used in an election. If a state government was so foolish to sign a contract stating otherwise, and they can't get out of it, then that government will just have to eat the cost, fire the officials so stupid as to agree to such a contract, and replace the equipment with something that can be tested and proved secure.
(Log in to post comments)
Plan for voting machine probe dropped after lawsuit threat (nj.com) Posted Mar 19, 2008 16:17 UTC (Wed) by jebba (subscriber, #4439) [Link] "fire the officials so stupid as to agree to such a contract...": they are of course "hired" via the very system that is the problem. For the most outrageous example of this, check the history of Chuck Hagel--he was CEO of the company Election Systems & Software that counted his own votes... Corbet for prez!
|
|||||||||||