| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Apparently, Verizon wasn't distributing?Apparently, Verizon wasn't distributing?Posted Mar 17, 2008 17:21 UTC (Mon) by sepreece (subscriber, #19270)Parent article: BusyBox Developers Agree To End GPL Lawsuit Against Verizon
At the time the suit was announced, there was a lot of discussion (here and in Groklaw) about whether Verizon actually was subject to GPL terms or not - whether they were distributing the software, or simply selling/renting boxes that contained software that Actiontec was the distributor for. The text of the announcement seems to imply, by omission, that it was not - no mention was made of Verizon having agreed to do anything differently.
(Log in to post comments)
Apparently, Verizon wasn't distributing? Posted Mar 18, 2008 1:30 UTC (Tue) by JoeBuck (subscriber, #2330) [Link] It seems to make clear that the responsibility for the violation was Actiontec's.
|
|
||||||||||||