Re: 2.6.25-rc5-mm1
[Posted March 12, 2008 by corbet]
| From: |
| Andrew Morton <akpm-AT-linux-foundation.org> |
| To: |
| serge-AT-hallyn.com |
| Subject: |
| Re: 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 |
| Date: |
| Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:39:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID: |
| <20080311133920.68dc410b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
| Cc: |
| linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org, linux-next-AT-vger.kernel.org |
| Archive-link: |
| Article,
Thread
|
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:23:00 -0500 serge@hallyn.com wrote:
> Quoting Andrew Morton (akpm@linux-foundation.org):
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches...
> >
> > - Added the kgdb tree as git-kgdb-light (Jason Wessel, Ingo Molnar)
> >
> > - Added a random-security-stuff-apart-from-selinux tree as
> > git-security-testing (James Morris)
> >
> > - suspend-to-disk is still busted on my x86_64 t61p (git-x86, iirc)
>
> Compiles and boots perfectly on s390 here.
whee.
Things are going much much more smoothly now than they were in 2.6.24-rcX
and 2.6.23-rcX. Tree integration problems are negligible and build errors
are far fewer and runtime problems seem to be less too. Fingers crossed.
I guess this is due to a combinaton of
a) linux-next
b) intensive whining and
c) extra care which maintainers are taking (due to a) and b))
I suspect that fewer people are testing linux-next and -mm nowadays. We
should encourage them to do so, although given the general
trainwreckishness of current mainline, this isn't really where our effort
should be expended.
(
Log in to post comments)