| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
The first Gnash beta is outThe first Gnash beta is outPosted Mar 9, 2008 21:54 UTC (Sun) by sylware (subscriber, #35259)In reply to: The first Gnash beta is out by nix Parent article: The first Gnash beta is out
>I'm afraid that from your comments, it seems you're a simplicity-for-the- >sake-of-it man who doesn't understand that sometimes driving complexity >into the language enables you to make the things built atop that language >simpler.) That's schoolar sighted. In the reality, coding clean object-oriented software is *hard*: with object-oriented semantic hardwired directly into the syntax, coders tend to produce a kind of "object-orientish" mixture, just for the sake to be "object-oriented". That's from the code I read and my experience. BTW, if you dislike the STL... have a look at the boost lib... gnash uses it...
(Log in to post comments)
The first Gnash beta is out Posted Mar 11, 2008 8:37 UTC (Tue) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] Um, I *like* the STL. I dislike its *syntax*. I can't even tell if you consider Boost better than the STL, or worse... (Anyway, it's plain to me that you're not reading anything here clearly, so I'll stop trying to talk to you.)
|
|
||||||||||||