|
Developer interview: Eric Sandeen on ext4 implementationDeveloper interview: Eric Sandeen on ext4 implementationPosted Mar 9, 2008 19:26 UTC (Sun) by beoba (guest, #16942)In reply to: Developer interview: Eric Sandeen on ext4 implementation by jwb Parent article: Developer interview: Eric Sandeen on ext4 implementation
I'm using JFS, haven't ever had problems. Though I also haven't had issues with other filesystems either. To Grandparent: What sort of oddities does JFS have? Really, I consider filesystems to be one of those things that if you're getting frequent updates, there's probably something wrong.
(Log in to post comments)
Developer interview: Eric Sandeen on ext4 implementation Posted Mar 10, 2008 21:14 UTC (Mon) by alankila (subscriber, #47141) [Link] My experience: I used JFS as system disk for a debian testing or unstable distro for a few years. The disk was always pretty tight on space (80 % or so), so I guess fragmentation took its toll with the massive volume of updates coming in almost every day. In the end days, the filesystem had abysmal performance -- I recall that doing anything at all on it basically stalled the computer into a long-term disk-crunching session. These days I have switched to ext3. I have figured it doesn't really make any kind of practical difference, and it's best to use the thing that most others use as well. I haven't noticed similar performance loss with time in any other filesystem I have used.
|
Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
Powered by Rackspace Managed Hosting.