Ubuntu bug tracking - registration-required and non-free software

> The two issues you bring up are separate:

Yes, separate but related. That's why I put them in the post as separate paragraphs.

> I'm not sure that I agree that getting anonymous reports actually helps the project

A good thing that's not what I'm advocating then.

I'm pointing out that requiring registration is a significant barrier to the implied goal of
"Ubuntu wants all users to be involved with bug squashing." Removing registration does *not*
mean "getting anonymous bug reports helps the project".

Consider e.g. the Debian bug tracker, which requires no registration, yet has plenty of
communication with bug submitters.

> even if the software were open, you wouldn't be able to modify the copy running at
launchpad.net

Again, that's orthogonal to the point. If the bug tracker program were published free software
(again, like the Debian bug tracker, which is published as the 'debbugs' package), it's at
least *feasible* for an outsider to present a patch that implements a desired change in
behaviour. There's nothing compelling them to implement a given patch, but publishing the tool
as a maintained free software package would at least demonstrate they were open to the
possibility.

By implementing their bug tracker as non-free software, they give the lie to the idea that
they want community involvement in the bug tracking process, because the tools used are an
essential part of that process.