Risk report: Three years of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 [LWN.net]

Risk report: Three years of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4

Posted Feb 28, 2008 10:51 UTC (Thu) by errare_est (guest, #14275)
In reply to: Risk report: Three years of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 by drag
Parent article: Risk report: Three years of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4

I do run debian/(unstable|sid) on my workstation, but having that on a production server is
too risky: I love my weekends.

(Log in to post comments)

Risk report: Three years of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4

Posted Mar 1, 2008 1:02 UTC (Sat) by jordanb (subscriber, #45668) [Link]

Debian Testing doesn't seem to me to any more risky than Ubuntu Stable.

If you want incredibly carefully built and tested release, you need to go with Debian Stable.
If you want quick releases, then, well, modulus Canonical's advertising, there's some risk in
that.