| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
KHB: Synthesis: An Efficient Implementation of Fundamental Operating Systems ServicesKHB: Synthesis: An Efficient Implementation of Fundamental Operating Systems ServicesPosted Feb 27, 2008 22:51 UTC (Wed) by pphaneuf (subscriber, #23480)In reply to: KHB: Synthesis: An Efficient Implementation of Fundamental Operating Systems Services by zlynx Parent article: KHB: Synthesis: An Efficient Implementation of Fundamental Operating Systems Services
My way is ugly. That way is insane. Still, I wish it was possible to manipulate vptrs and vtbls more in C++. Things like having two different implementations of a virtual method with the same signature inherited from two parents would make sense, for example (say, the "draw" methods you get while deriving from both Drawable and Cowboy).
(Log in to post comments)
KHB: Synthesis: An Efficient Implementation of Fundamental Operating Systems Services Posted Feb 28, 2008 20:59 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] Insane? Oh. So, er, I should be ashamed that I did almost exactly that (via a custom allocator layered atop big mmap()ed hunks) in C about a year ago? (Well, it was more like a twisted sort of RCU: I'd construct a new instance that was a copy of the old one with a zero reference count, then changing pointers in the new instance's VMT-analogue, translating the object's data into a new representation at the same time. The old instance got reference-zapped when nobody was executing methods via those pointers anymore.) (yes, there were pressing reasons. It was a bundle of fun, as well. :) )
|
|
||||||||||||