| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
They shouldn't ask about text editorsThey shouldn't ask about text editorsPosted Feb 22, 2008 12:36 UTC (Fri) by tnoo (subscriber, #20427)In reply to: They shouldn't ask about text editors by Wummel Parent article: 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice award winners
Looks very much like Emacs, what's the big advantage?
(Log in to post comments)
They shouldn't ask about text editors Posted Feb 22, 2008 14:18 UTC (Fri) by aleXXX (subscriber, #2742) [Link] eFTE... I used xfte for a long time, it seems it has been revived now ? This is good news :-) Really lightweight, easy-very-fast-to-use, very configurable editor. What the difference to emacs is ? Well, it's a completely different editor, you can do a lot without having to learn shortcut sequences before (but you can use them too)ยท It's (of course) less programmable than emacs. Alex
They shouldn't ask about text editors Posted Feb 22, 2008 14:19 UTC (Fri) by vonbrand (subscriber, #4458) [Link] Looks somewhat like emacs (for that, if you don't like emacsen, why don't you just use joe in its jmacs personality?), plus its homepage lists almost everything that makes a "real editor" in my book (multiple screens, multiple modes, ...) a TODO?
They shouldn't ask about text editors Posted Feb 22, 2008 15:21 UTC (Fri) by mbottrell (guest, #43008) [Link] Every knows real programmers don't use text editors. ;-)
They shouldn't ask about text editors Posted Mar 21, 2008 20:25 UTC (Fri) by jeremy_c (guest, #51207) [Link] Hm, where did you see multiple screens, modes, etc... as a Todo? Those have been implemented for a very, very long time.
|
|
||||||||||||