I don't scroll down this page that often, but when I do, ClamAV always seems to be here...
Why is that?
(I just did a search at the CVE database, and it tells me there were 21 vulnerabilities in the
last year. Cross that with staggering across different distributions releasing updates for
the same vulnerability, and I guess it *would* be here pretty much every week. Wow.)
Posted Feb 22, 2008 17:00 UTC (Fri) by bronson (subscriber, #4806)
[Link]
Lessee...
http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?advancedsearch
A quick search shows 53 vulnerabilities -- mostly medium and high -- since May 2005. They've
been running at 1.6 vulnerabilities per month for almost 3 years!
You're not mistaken. Can anybody explain why clamav has such an awful security record?
I ran clamav until it choked on a poorly-formatted MIME attachment in 2005 and stalled my mail
queue for days. Since it was adding significantly to my headache surface and SpamAssassin was
rejecting most of the viruses anyway, ClamAV was banished without regret.
That's funny... The very program on your computer meant to reduce viruses makes it easy to --
by receiving a single email -- turne your Linux server into a virus host. You've got fail.
(Of course, this particular bug doesn't look all that scary to me... Nobody runs important
servers on the same box as they have untrusted users, do they?)
clamav: arbitrary file overwrite
Posted Feb 25, 2008 20:44 UTC (Mon) by janfrode (subscriber, #244)
[Link]
> Can anybody explain why clamav has such an awful security record?
Maybe because it has to support unpacking of all kinds of file formats (arj, rar, zoo, zip,
base64, uuencoded, pdf, etc..) based on unpackers/libraries which are typically not written
with with security in mind.
CVE-2007-6337 -- vulnerability in the bzip2 decompression algorithm
CVE-2007-6336 -- ... crafted MS-ZIP compressed CAB file.
CVE-2007-6335 -- ... crafted MEW packed PE file
CVE-2007-3725 -- ... crafted RAR archive
CVE-2007-3123 -- ... crafted RAR file
CVE-2007-3122 -- bypass scanning via a RAR file with a header flag
Still I feel quite a bit safer with clamav (+selinux) on our mail gateways, than I did with
Trend Micro IMSS..
clamav: arbitrary file overwrite
Posted Feb 25, 2008 21:02 UTC (Mon) by im14u2c (subscriber, #5246)
[Link]
I guess that makes sense somewhat. I imagine these vulnerabilities get fixed in the upstream
packages too, so it makes everything more secure.