| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
They shouldn't ask about text editorsThey shouldn't ask about text editorsPosted Feb 22, 2008 9:32 UTC (Fri) by coriordan (guest, #7544)Parent article: 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice award winners
They shouldn't ask about text editors. Emacs' low score just exposes how noob their readership is :-p http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/poll.php?do=showr...
(Log in to post comments)
Ignore that link Posted Feb 22, 2008 10:40 UTC (Fri) by coriordan (guest, #7544) [Link] Ignore that link. The website seems to try to make it difficult to look at or link to poll results unless you register and log in. Kinda annoying - and now I can't even find a link to how I found the link. IIRC Emacs gets 8.9%.
They shouldn't ask about text editors Posted Feb 22, 2008 11:34 UTC (Fri) by alextingle (subscriber, #20593) [Link] Your favourite text editor sucks!
They shouldn't ask about text editors Posted Feb 22, 2008 12:12 UTC (Fri) by Wummel (subscriber, #7591) [Link] I hate both vi and emacs alike. Vi has the small advantage of being installed pretty much anywhere, so I use it from time to time when nothing else is available. Having said that, I like the eFTE editor. It has all the features a programmer needs, and it is really fast, plus it runs under Unix, Mac OSX, and Windows.
They shouldn't ask about text editors Posted Feb 22, 2008 12:36 UTC (Fri) by tnoo (subscriber, #20427) [Link] Looks very much like Emacs, what's the big advantage?
They shouldn't ask about text editors Posted Feb 22, 2008 14:18 UTC (Fri) by aleXXX (subscriber, #2742) [Link] eFTE... I used xfte for a long time, it seems it has been revived now ? This is good news :-) Really lightweight, easy-very-fast-to-use, very configurable editor. What the difference to emacs is ? Well, it's a completely different editor, you can do a lot without having to learn shortcut sequences before (but you can use them too)ยท It's (of course) less programmable than emacs. Alex
They shouldn't ask about text editors Posted Feb 22, 2008 14:19 UTC (Fri) by vonbrand (subscriber, #4458) [Link] Looks somewhat like emacs (for that, if you don't like emacsen, why don't you just use joe in its jmacs personality?), plus its homepage lists almost everything that makes a "real editor" in my book (multiple screens, multiple modes, ...) a TODO?
They shouldn't ask about text editors Posted Feb 22, 2008 15:21 UTC (Fri) by mbottrell (guest, #43008) [Link] Every knows real programmers don't use text editors. ;-)
They shouldn't ask about text editors Posted Mar 21, 2008 20:25 UTC (Fri) by jeremy_c (guest, #51207) [Link] Hm, where did you see multiple screens, modes, etc... as a Todo? Those have been implemented for a very, very long time.
|
|
||||||||||||