LWN.net Logo

Reverse engineering: more than NVIDIA deserves?

Reverse engineering: more than NVIDIA deserves?

Posted Feb 19, 2008 9:36 UTC (Tue) by yodermk (subscriber, #3803)
In reply to: Reverse engineering: more than NVIDIA deserves? by rsidd
Parent article: Reverse engineering: more than NVIDIA deserves?

> I suppose those are the same users that won't use
Adobe's flash player, or Adobe Reader

Vastly different context than kernel modules/closed hardware.

I use Skype, Flash, and (rarely but occasionally Acrobat Reader).  Although I would be
grateful for adequate Free alternatives, there is nowhere near the urgency of replacing those
as there is of replacing closed kernel modules.  Closed kernel modules have a good list of
practical disadvantages, including being tied to the vendor when you want to upgrade the
kernel or x.org.  If there's a problem, *only* the vendor can fix it, not the hundreds of
awesome kernel hackers.  And there are potential legal problems.

(Yes, I use the closed nVidia driver on my laptop now, but I'm not happy about it.  I'll
switch to Noveau when it's ready and I'm certainly buying ATi on my next computer.)

> Vendors who
want to pre-install Linux are unlikely to be put off by NVidia's proprietary driver.

Haven't you read the comments from the Dell Linux guy?  Dell now *actively* prefers hardware
with open specs, *even for systems they pre-install Windows on*!!!


(Log in to post comments)

Reverse engineering: more than NVIDIA deserves?

Posted Feb 22, 2008 15:23 UTC (Fri) by wilck (subscriber, #29844) [Link]

> Haven't you read the comments from the Dell Linux guy?  Dell now *actively* > prefers
hardware
> with open specs, *even for systems they pre-install Windows on*!!!

Please have a look at Dell's offerings. Except for the low-end, all laptops have NVidia
boards. Even the "Open Source PC" comes with an NVidia board.

Copyright © 2012, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds