Recent Features
| |||||||||||||
Reverse engineering: more than NVIDIA deserves?Reverse engineering: more than NVIDIA deserves?Posted Feb 18, 2008 21:12 UTC (Mon) by sbergman27 (subscriber, #10767)In reply to: Reverse engineering: more than NVIDIA deserves? by smoogen Parent article: Reverse engineering: more than NVIDIA deserves?
""" If RMS hadn't been pissed about proprietary Emacs """ When was Emacs proprietary?
(Log in to post comments)
Reverse engineering: more than NVIDIA deserves? Posted Feb 18, 2008 22:15 UTC (Mon) by Cato (subscriber, #7643) [Link] One example of a proprietary Emacs was Gosling Emacs, which started out open source (of a sort) then went proprietary as Unipress Emacs. It was nowhere near as nice as GNU Emacs once that matured, but it was around before that - early 80s at least. I once wrote a filtering newsgroup reader based on Gosling Emacs - this tool worked quite well but dealing with the fairly horrible and slow Mocklisp included in that Emacs was painful...
Reverse engineering: more than NVIDIA deserves? Posted Feb 18, 2008 23:37 UTC (Mon) by madscientist (subscriber, #16861) [Link] My recollection of Gosling Emacs was that the embedded language was more C like than Lisp like... I might even still have a manual in my basement somewhere.
Reverse engineering: more than NVIDIA deserves? Posted Feb 18, 2008 22:19 UTC (Mon) by epa (subscriber, #39769) [Link]
|
|||||||||||||