Sponsored link
Vyatta –
Linux & Open Source
Alternative to Cisco –
Advanced Routing,
Firewall, VPN, QoS..
Free Download ->
| |||||||||||
Interesting, not unexpected.Interesting, not unexpected.Posted Feb 13, 2008 20:29 UTC (Wed) by muwlgr (guest, #35359)In reply to: Interesting, not unexpected. by drag Parent article: DNS Inventor Warns of Next Big Threat (Dark Reading)
What's instead if email ? "IM2000" by djb ? Instant messaging does not care about message storage. It does not offer something like IMAP.
(Log in to post comments)
I think they meant (E)SMTP. Posted Feb 13, 2008 23:51 UTC (Wed) by jd (guest, #26381) [Link] Their complaints wouldn't apply to X.400 (which is still e-mail), where something like IMAP or POP3 would certainly be very usable.I think most people have given up on Lotus Notes, and DEC Mail had numerous scripting vulnerabilities that made it a Really Bad System. Trying to think of any other half-decent mechanisms, but nothing springs to mind. Since delivery of e-mail is essentially appending to files (a special case of patching), there are probably ways of using version control systems to deliver multiple e-mails (even to multiple users) in a single network transaction securely. Never heard of anyone doing this though.
I think they meant (E)SMTP. Posted Feb 14, 2008 12:02 UTC (Thu) by nim-nim (subscriber, #34454) [Link] > Since delivery of e-mail is essentially appending to files ( Only if you've not switched to maildir-like stores yet
|
|||||||||||