Sure, a simple project works great with any of several build strategies,
so of course not everyone will be thrilled by switching. But if CMake
only lacks the "I got burned by #!@%*& CMake" contingent, it's already
ahead of the competition.
Posted Feb 7, 2008 12:36 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
My *eyes* got burned by cmake's language.
Haven't they learned that capital letters make things *harder* to read? Have we learned
nothing since the days when Lisp was written in capitals?
LCA: Disintermediating distributions
Posted Feb 7, 2008 14:26 UTC (Thu) by aleXXX (subscriber, #2742)
[Link]
Since CMake 2.4.3, released July 2006 (or around that version) the
commands can be written lowercase, with the coming version 2.6 this is
even the preferred style (i.e. which is used in the documentation).
Alex
LCA: Disintermediating distributions
Posted Feb 7, 2008 21:28 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
YES! (Time to upgrade. Is my cmake really that old?
... 2.4.1. dammit.)
LCA: Disintermediating distributions
Posted Feb 7, 2008 22:10 UTC (Thu) by aleXXX (subscriber, #2742)
[Link]
2.4.1 was a beta version, a lots of bugs were fixed for 2.4.3. Version
2.4.8 has been released a few weeks ago, I recommend you use this. If
there is no package for your distro, just download the binary package
from www.cmake.org and just unpack it in some place you like, it will
work.
Alex
LCA: Disintermediating distributions
Posted Feb 7, 2008 23:19 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
Yeah, like I said, it was really stupid of me not to upgrade. In fact I've
*got* a more recent version installed: it's just this bloody old version
in /usr/local/bin was hiding it... *sigh* chkdupexe time, I think.