| Weekly edition | Kernel | Security | Distributions | Search |
| Archives | Calendar | Subscribe | Write for LWN | LWN.net FAQ |
LCA: Disintermediating distributions
LCA: Disintermediating distributions
Posted Feb 7, 2008 0:38 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: LCA: Disintermediating distributions by vmole
Parent article: LCA: Disintermediating distributions
Well, I know Paul D. Smith (the GNU make author) has said that in the past, and I agree with him (for what very little it's worth).
(Log in to post comments)
LCA: Disintermediating distributions
Posted Feb 7, 2008 1:11 UTC (Thu) by stevenj (subscriber, #421) [Link]
Note that GNU make itself is built using automake, so it seems the GNU make developers have voted with their feet on this one.
LCA: Disintermediating distributions
Posted Feb 7, 2008 1:41 UTC (Thu) by stevenj (subscriber, #421) [Link]
(Although, to be fair, it's not like they could require GNU make to build. =)
LCA: Disintermediating distributions
Posted Feb 7, 2008 7:05 UTC (Thu) by madscientist (subscriber, #16861) [Link]
Although GNU make does come with an automake environment, it also provides a shell script that can be used to build make. Obviously this will recompile and relink everything every time you run it, but GNU make is not such a huge program that this is a problem. And once you've got it built once, you can use that make for subsequent builds. Having this avoids the catch-22 of needing some make to build make. That said, automake is awesome especially if you're developing highly portable tools, which most of the GNU tools are. For GNU make I don't so much care about the portability aspects, although that's nice too (but the shell script above would be enough of an "out" for GNU make itself). The great thing about automake is all the default rules it provides, including things like distcheck for building new packages, etc. These rules save huge amounts of time and effort for package developers/maintainers.
LCA: Disintermediating distributions
Posted Feb 15, 2008 11:51 UTC (Fri) by ekj (subscriber, #1524) [Link]
The catch-22 of needing a make-program to compile gnu make isn't that much of a problem really. You need a C compiler to compile GCC too. If you want it self-compiled you need to compile it twice: First use whatever C-compiler you happen to have lying around to compile GCC. Then use your fresh gcc to compile gcc.
LCA: Disintermediating distributions
Posted Feb 15, 2008 22:00 UTC (Fri) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]
With recent versions, thanks to the magic of top-level bootstrap, `make' should give you a compiler and libraries byte-for-byte identical to what you'd have got if you did the recompile-it dance. (Older versions wouldn't have recompiled libiberty with the new compiler before linking that compiler with it; top-level bootstrap has fixed that.)