Weekly Edition Return to the Distributions pageSponsored link Serve your customers, not your servers, with VERIO Linux VPS. Full-access test-drive here. |
An interview with the new openSUSE community manager
Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier has joined the openSUSE
project as the openSUSE community manager. We were pleased to have the
opportunity to ask Zonker a few questions about his new job.
Many LWN readers will remember that you were a regular contributor to LWN. Any comments on what you have been up to between there and here?
Sure -- I stopped contributing to LWN when I took a full-time job with
OSTG/Linux.com (now the company known as SourceForge), and had to stop
freelancing. I was editorial director there for two years, and then
joined Linux Magazine as Editor-in-Chief. I've missed contributing to
LWN, but I still read LWN religiously.
As community manager will you be employed by Novell?
Yes.
Will you report to the openSUSE board?
I will be working with the board, but I report to Justin Steinman at
Novell. It's an unusual position, though, because my job is in large
part to be an advocate/ombudsman for the community.
openSUSE has adopted a Code of Conduct for mailing lists and IRC. As community manager, will policing this traffic be a part of your job?
No -- we don't plan to have anyone actively policing the lists looking
for violations. Instead, the board is working on a policy to allow
community members to bring violations of the Code to the board to
decide whether disciplinary action should be needed. I hope that it's
something that won't be needed often, or at all -- and I don't think
it will be needed often.
How much control does Novell hold over openSUSE development? Should there be more or less control? Is Novell allowing the community to make its own decisions?
Right now, I'd say Novell is still guiding development pretty closely,
but would like the community to have a more prominent voice in the
direction of the development of openSUSE. I think the Fedora Project
is a pretty good model here, and I really think Max Spevack did a
great job in terms of helping Fedora come into its own.
The openSUSE Board appointed last November is a step towards giving the community more control over governance of the project. This is a new position. How much latitude will you have to define what the community manager is/does?
Well, certain aspects of the job are already well-defined. For
example, a big part of the job will be traveling to conferences to
speak about openSUSE and also to organize an openSUSE conference. But
there's definitely some room to define the role as well.
OpenSUSE has a weekly news letter which has come out almost weekly since its inception last November. Do you have any plans to get involved with that? Is it useful?
Yes, I do plan to contribute and help out with that where needed. I
think it's very useful -- communication is vital to the health of a
project like openSUSE. There are a lot of people contributing to
openSUSE, and without something like the weekly news, it would be easy
for contributors to lose track of what their colleagues are doing.
It's also important to spreading the news outside of the openSUSE
community so that other open source projects know what we're up to and
possibly find ways to collaborate and help reduce duplication of
effort between projects. Finally, I think it's a good way to show what
various contributors are doing and help recognize the contributors
that are having an impact on openSUSE.
What are your plans for the openSUSE community?
Over the long term, I'd like to help foster increased adoption of
openSUSE by a significant amount -- which means doing a better job of
promoting the distro, as well as communicating with potential users
and finding out what it is they need/want from openSUSE and working on
delivering that. (I'd encourage LWN readers to check out the alpha
builds for openSUSE 11.0 and give us feedback as we're working on the
final 11.0 release that should be done in July.)
I also want to work on developing a recognition system so that contributors are acknowledged for their work, which we're doing more on already -- we just announced our membership program for contributors to be recognized. I also want to make sure we're providing a "roadmap" so that potential contributors have a clear path into the project and know where to get started -- whether that's development, artwork, documentation, quality assurance, advocating openSUSE, or supporting other users. Also, organize the first openSUSE conference, make sure openSUSE is better represented at other conferences, and help provide potential contributors with a roadmap to becoming contributors. I'd like to make it as easy as possible for people to participate. Finally, but not least -- I want to do what I can to help coordinate increased cooperation between Linux distros and reduce duplication of effort. While a lot of folks might like to portray the situation as openSUSE vs. Fedora, Ubuntu, or any other distro, I don't see it that way -- if someone is already happily using another distro, then I consider that a win. I want to focus on attracting people who aren't running Linux at all yet. There's plenty of work left to do, and I hope we can do a better job of pooling our resources to attract those people. Is there anything you would like to add?
Just that I'd like to encourage LWN readers to visit
zonker.opensuse.org and news.opensuse.org for updates on the openSUSE
project, and to feel free to contact me (zonker@opensuse.org) with any
questions, suggestions, and comments related to openSUSE.
Thank you for taking the time to answer our questions. (Log in to post comments)
An interview with the new openSUSE community manager Posted Feb 5, 2008 22:59 UTC (Tue) by TxtEdMacs (subscriber, #5983) [Link] I remember writing SUSE as a mixed case string, i.e. SuSE. Doing a quick Google search I was surprised to find nearly all instances on the first page as all upper case. Not so on the second page it began to match what I thought was the proper form, hence, my mind is not as addled as I thought. Here is one link from that list: http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0... However, the important questions might be: 1.) does it matter? and 2.) if it does, was there a significant reason to have written it that form? Sort of curious. My take on this is the "u" is for the German und (and, in English), hence, if correct a conjunction does not deserve to be capitalized, even in German. P.S. Just hit the link as printed, copying it out gets you to a bogus location.
An interview with the new openSUSE community manager Posted Feb 5, 2008 23:39 UTC (Tue) by dmarti (subscriber, #11625) [Link] Actually, they started as S.u.S.E.. They they lost the dots, then after the Novell acquisition they uppercased the U.
An interview with the new openSUSE community manager Posted Feb 6, 2008 10:12 UTC (Wed) by epa (subscriber, #39769) [Link] They have a long way to go to catch up with NeXTStep / NeXTSTEP / NEXTSTEP / OpenStep / OPENSTEP.
An interview with the new openSUSE community manager Posted Feb 5, 2008 23:39 UTC (Tue) by danielthaler (subscriber, #24764) [Link] Well, as the link says SuSE was (originally) "System und Software Entwicklung" which is system and software development. These days SUSE is Novells brand for it's Linux product, so there's no need for "odd" capitalisation.
An interview with the new openSUSE community manager Posted Feb 6, 2008 4:44 UTC (Wed) by whiprush (subscriber, #23428) [Link] zonker rocks.
|
Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
Powered by Rackspace Managed Hosting.