| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Revocable GPL (Groklaw)Revocable GPL (Groklaw)Posted Feb 1, 2008 21:42 UTC (Fri) by lysse (guest, #3190)In reply to: Revocable GPL (Groklaw) by ncm Parent article: The Non-Revocable GPL (Groklaw)
Right, that's your angle. You really should have stated that up-front. It's all very well saying "I am not a lawyer" at the end of every post arguing that you're right anyway, but without actually having a proper legal opinion to offer, all you're doing with your insistence that your interpretation must be correct is FUDding (in the most literal sense). Stop it, please. If you aren't 100% sure of your ground (and your pains to point out that you aren't a lawyer suggest that you're at the very least aware that you *shouldn't* be), then you're far better advised to raise the question than to insist that you know the answer.
(Log in to post comments)
Revocable GPL (Groklaw) Posted Feb 2, 2008 6:11 UTC (Sat) by ncm (subscriber, #165) [Link] I did state it up front: I don't know how serious the problem is. What I am certain of is that everybody who says they do know is either lying or deluded.
|
|
||||||||||||