| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Revocable GPL (Groklaw)Revocable GPL (Groklaw)Posted Jan 31, 2008 19:51 UTC (Thu) by ncm (subscriber, #165)In reply to: Revocable GPL (Groklaw) by rahvin Parent article: The Non-Revocable GPL (Groklaw)
In essence, (1) rahvin knows better than any lawyer, (2) it would be very inconvenient if he was wrong, (3) popcorn!; *therefore* there's nothing to worry about. That's some fine reasoning.
(Log in to post comments)
Revocable GPL (Groklaw) Posted Feb 1, 2008 21:54 UTC (Fri) by lysse (guest, #3190) [Link] Isn't that precisely your own reasoning, though? (1) ncm knows better than the lawyers who drew up the document in the first place; (2) it would be very inconvenient if he were right; (3) OMFGBBQZ!!!!
Revocable GPL (Groklaw) Posted Feb 2, 2008 6:07 UTC (Sat) by ncm (subscriber, #165) [Link] The lawyers who drew up the document in the first place don't claim to know either. Not knowing is itself the problem.
|
|
||||||||||||