| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Nokia to acquire TrolltechNokia to acquire TrolltechPosted Jan 28, 2008 15:42 UTC (Mon) by dkite (guest, #4577)In reply to: Nokia to acquire Trolltech by erwbgy Parent article: Nokia to acquire Trolltech
One comes to mind immediately. Trolltech lived on the desktop. Their revenue streams were a library for developers, and their marketing was KDE. When KDE looked good, Qt looked good. Their moves into the portable/phone/handheld market was built on the foundation of their desktop business. Nokia is a phone company. How interested is Nokia in the desktop? What was a primary business now becomes not even secondary. How does KDE advance Nokia? Why would Nokia care about KDE? Words don't matter to me, revenue streams do. Derek (who uses KDE and am wondering)
(Log in to post comments)
Nokia to acquire Trolltech Posted Jan 28, 2008 16:02 UTC (Mon) by michaeljt (subscriber, #39183) [Link] > How interested is Nokia in the desktop? ... > Why would Nokia care about KDE? This is just a thought, not an informed opinion, but since mobile phones are increasingly desktop-like, and KDE is increasingly multi-platform Nokia might just be interested in KDE.
Nokia to acquire Trolltech Posted Jan 28, 2008 19:50 UTC (Mon) by martinfick (subscriber, #4455) [Link] "How does KDE advance Nokia? Why would Nokia care about KDE? Words don't matter to me, revenue streams do."Since KDE happens to be highly tied to TrollTech's revenue stream today, what makes you think that a company would waste its money buying another company to just intentionally destroy its current revenue stream? While over time this revenue stream could be replaced with another one (and that *may* be the intent), it would seem to be a loss to eliminate an existing one as long as it doesn't interfere with the new one that you think might actually outperform the old one. So, yes, revenues streams are extremely important, and smart/successful businesses don't just pay money to throw them away for some pie in the sky future potential revenue stream.
Nokia to acquire Trolltech Posted Jan 29, 2008 3:42 UTC (Tue) by dkite (guest, #4577) [Link] Are you saying that Nokia bought Trolltech so they could get into the desktop software business? Somehow that doesn't make sense to me. Nokia does phones. They have tried to extend the phone, along with the rest of the market. Trolltech has some technology that fits that purpose and market. How does KDE fit into that? http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/3235 tells us that the price isn't high and Trolltech hasn't been enormously profitable this last while. I have this strange need for business arrangements to make sense. If there isn't a symbiotic relationship between a business and a free software project that makes sense, I take that into consideration. So for you, how does KDE make sense for Nokia, notwithstanding the soothing words? Derek
Nokia to acquire Trolltech Posted Jan 29, 2008 10:30 UTC (Tue) by kripkenstein (subscriber, #43281) [Link] Trolltech is terribly small compared to Nokia, which is one of the largest companies in the world, in fact. It has more annual revenue than Microsoft. The acquisition may have nothing to do with Trolltech's revenue stream. Perhaps Nokia believes that incorporating parts of Qt in its System 40 and S60 will grow those revenue streams by 1%; that would make this a worthy investment, even if all Trolltech revenue vanishes overnight. If it raises them by 10%, well, pacts have been made with the devil for far less. All of Trolltech's current revenue is completely dwarfed by these business interests. Now, this is just speculation, time will tell. But based on the press releases, Nokia does in fact intend to continue to push System 40 and S60, with Qt included in some manner (sadly, no move to Linux...). As this is Nokia's *core* business, I presume that this is the reason for the acquisition. The thing to remember is that Trolltech needed money to survive somehow. They built a nice business model around Qt, and KDE was a big part of that. Nokia has completely different interests; it can run its Qt division with no revenue whatsoever if it helps out other departments, like, again, its core business.
|
|
||||||||||||