| |||||||||||||
Using fsck to defend against disk failures?Using fsck to defend against disk failures?Posted Jan 27, 2008 16:32 UTC (Sun) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: Using fsck to defend against disk failures? by anton Parent article: ext3 metaclustering
My mum's ancient 486 laptop had a really strange disk failure this Christmas. It started with a single bad sector, but then within about fifteen minutes one third of the sectors on the disk (in contiguous runs of varying length) were returning, not bad sectors, but `sector not found', i.e. the drive couldn't even find the sector address markers. What I suspect may have happened, based on my extensive lack of experience in hard drive design, is that all the G forces the head assembly is exposed to whenever a seek happens had over time twisted the head reading the farthest side of whichever platter didn't contain the servo track out of true, so that when the servo track said it was over track X, the topmost heads were actually midway between tracks or something like that. In that position they couldn't read the sector addresses, couldn't find any data, and whoompfh, goodbye data. (I've never heard of this failure mode anywhere else, and perhaps it was something different, but still, it was very strange. Disks *can* go mostly bad all at once. It's just rare.)
(Log in to post comments)
Disk failures Posted Jan 27, 2008 21:58 UTC (Sun) by anton (guest, #25547) [Link] Disk drives have not used servo tracks for a long time, because one could no longer align all the heads precisely enough (e.g., because of thermal expansion). Instead, servo information exists on each platter, interspersed in some way with the data. I don't know when this change happened; a 15+-year old disk (486 generation) might still have a servo track. But couldn't the symptoms also be explained by the failure of just one of the heads?
Disk failures Posted Jan 27, 2008 22:55 UTC (Sun) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] I said it was a prehistoric system, and indeed anything more modern than about, what, 1991 won't have this problem. I'm not sure if a head failure could cause a failure to find sector address markers: I'm not sure if you could even distinguish the two cases without digging into the drive. (As I said, my expertise in hard drive engineering is notable mainly by its absence.) It's just that heads are solid-state, and solid-state stuff doesn't die all that often, while the head assembly itself is being wrenched all over the place: simple bending could explain this, I think.
|
|||||||||||||