| |||||||||||||
Yes. and No. and Yes.Yes. and No. and Yes.Posted Jan 18, 2008 8:59 UTC (Fri) by njs (guest, #40338)In reply to: Yes. and No. and Yes. by nix Parent article: State of the unionfs
I thought that the point of fakeroot was that it let you do arbitrary (virtual) chown/chmod's on files you had just created, not that it let you scribble randomly on the existing filesystem. I guess you could have, like, a FUSE filesystem that allowed anyone to do arbitrary chown/chmod, but could only be mounted nodev nosuid. That might be safe and effective. Or something with containers?
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||