Re: [UNIONFS] 00/29 Unionfs and related patches pre-merge review
(v2)
[Posted January 15, 2008 by corbet]
| From: |
| Christoph Hellwig <hch-AT-infradead.org> |
| To: |
| Erez Zadok <ezk-AT-cs.sunysb.edu> |
| Subject: |
| Re: [UNIONFS] 00/29 Unionfs and related patches pre-merge review
(v2) |
| Date: |
| Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:08:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID: |
| <20080110150808.GA32080@infradead.org> |
| Cc: |
| torvalds-AT-linux-foundation.org, akpm-AT-linux-foundation.org,
hch-AT-infradead.org, viro-AT-ftp.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel-AT-vger.kernel.org |
| Archive-link: |
| Article,
Thread
|
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:59:19AM -0500, Erez Zadok wrote:
>
> Dear Linus, Al, Christoph, and Andrew,
>
> As per your request, I'm posting for review the unionfs code (and related
> code) that's in my korg tree against mainline (v2.6.24-rc7-71-gfd0b45d).
> This is in preparation for merge in 2.6.25.
Huh? There's still aboslutely not fix to the underlying problems of
the whole idea. I think we made it pretty clear that unionfs is not
the way to go, and that we'll get the union mount patches clear once
the per-mountpoint r/o and unprivilegued mount patches series are in
and stable.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
(
Log in to post comments)