> As phrased, you seem to be asserting that (a) Perl5 has shortcomings,
> (b) Ruby has shortcomings, (c) Perl6 has no shortcomings. I hope that
> isn't what you mean, but you see how it makes people suspicious of
> Perl6 when its proponents seem to be advertising it that way...
I think what he meant was "(c) Perl6 has /other/ shortcomings, but not
the same ones"