iPlayer for Linux wins approval of open sourcers (ZDNet UK)
[Posted December 18, 2007 by ris]
ZDNet UK looks
at the BBC's move to make its iPlayer online on-demand TV service
available for streaming on Linux systems. "Following a meeting with
the OSC [Open Source Consortium], the BBC's independent governing body, the
BBC Trust, restated its commitment to make the download version of iPlayer
"platform agnostic"."
(Log in to post comments)
approval of open sourcers
Posted Dec 19, 2007 2:17 UTC (Wed) by pjm (subscriber, #2080)
[Link]
Re “wins approval of open sourcers”, the article gives no indication of whether the player
will be open source, just that there's likely to be a binary available for one Linux-based
platform. Based on what's previously been said (DRM stuff), there's a good chance that it
won't be open source. It would be nice if at least some (most?) content could be available
without DRM (just as all video content has been available without DRM up until DVDs), allowing
easy viewing by open-source software.
approval of open sourcers
Posted Dec 19, 2007 3:41 UTC (Wed) by pr1268 (subscriber, #24648)
[Link]
I strongly doubt iPlayer will be open source. Far from it. But, I'm pleased that the BBC realizes that the personal computing world doesn't end at Microsoft.
approval of open sourcers
Posted Dec 19, 2007 8:32 UTC (Wed) by Klavs (subscriber, #10563)
[Link]
Posted Dec 19, 2007 9:43 UTC (Wed) by jengelh (subscriber, #33263)
[Link]
Solutions is the right word. [The problem of] DRM gets (dis)solved over time, either by
crackers or common sense. :-)
approval of open sourcers
Posted Dec 19, 2007 10:20 UTC (Wed) by slef (subscriber, #14720)
[Link]
The content is available without DRM in a way easily playable and storable by free/open source
software: over the air in north-west Europe in DVB-Terrestial and DVB-Satellite broadcasts.
That's part of why the expensive obsession with DRM/TPM in iPlayer is so depressingly silly.
The BBC seem to have forgotten that they are a national broadcaster, funded by compulsary
payments, and should be required to serve all people, whether or not we are in thrall to
Verisign or Microsoft or whoever. It's an error of the UK Government that there doesn't seem
to be any such requirement enforced.
approval of open sourcers
Posted Dec 19, 2007 14:17 UTC (Wed) by drag (subscriber, #31333)
[Link]
The only reason I see them doing this is because they sell BBC programming to the American
market. There are BBC shows on 'public television' (which is 'public' by name only) and there
is at least one BBC channel avialable for cable companies to subscribe to.
Then they make money on some shows, like DR. Who, being sold to other channels, not only to
mention DVD sales.
So if you'd ask them they are probably saying the reason they are doing DRM is to protect the
public's interest and to obtain funding for programming from methods other then taxation and
that sort of thing.
Having a high-quality internet feed will undermine this and almost certainly piss off their
associates outside the country. It may even be a requirement with certain companies they have
contracts with. Of course the BBC isn't ever going to publicly admit that they are letting
themselves be controlled by U.S. (and other) interests in exchange for profits.
Of course it's all pretty stupid, but this is how this sort of stuff works.
approval of open sourcers
Posted Dec 19, 2007 14:31 UTC (Wed) by ewan (subscriber, #5533)
[Link]
That's certainly the argument they make but it doesn't hold water. The
BBC already uses geolocation by IP address to restrict some services to
the UK, or to add advertising for clients outside the country. If you
make the assumption that everyone will always go direct to the BBC and
that no secondary copies will be made available then that would solve the
problem. If you take into account the fact the people can capture the
content and make it available on the various bittorrent sites etc. then
the DVB 'hole' is enough for those people, and forcing DRM on the online
versions adds nothing.