| |||||||||||||
conversation qualityconversation qualityPosted Dec 13, 2007 15:07 UTC (Thu) by corbet (editor, #1)In reply to: codec quality by DonDiego Parent article: Specifying codecs for the web Could I respectfully suggest that maybe this particular conversation has gone far enough? I'm not sure what else can be resolved through this particular line of argument. Thanks.
(Log in to post comments)
conversation quality Posted Dec 13, 2007 17:10 UTC (Thu) by nettings (subscriber, #429) [Link] agreed, and my apologies. it's just that i've been working with theora pretty much since first alpha (because it's the only available codec that allows free video streams worldwide), and i know many people who put great efforts into it, creating a free platform for those who care about such things. the derogatory nature (and lack of clue) of some comments here hit a nerve... taking your advice, i shall withdraw from the discussion now.
conversation quality Posted Dec 14, 2007 0:12 UTC (Fri) by DonDiego (subscriber, #24141) [Link] Sorry for getting a bit carried away and thanks for pulling us all back in line. However, I firmly believe that there is a point to be made here. Unfortunately the people disliking that point have started to kill the messenger... I shall try to make all further comments as respectful as possible.
|
|||||||||||||