| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
CorrectionCorrectionPosted Oct 25, 2007 5:03 UTC (Thu) by JoeBuck (subscriber, #2330)In reply to: An interesting historical artifact by JoeBuck Parent article: A potential competitor for GCC: pcc The compiler does have at least some support for prototypes, so it isn't pure K&R C. Not sure what all is missing at this point.
(Log in to post comments)
Correction Posted Oct 25, 2007 10:58 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] A proper (tokenizing) preprocessor? Last time I looked at PCC it not only had a K&R-style textual-transformation preprocessor, but its advocates were pushing this as a huge advantage.
|
|
||||||||||||