Special Treatment
Posted Oct 16, 2007 21:15 UTC (Tue) by
man_ls (subscriber, #15091)
In reply to:
Special Treatment by sbergman27
Parent article:
OSI Approves Microsoft License Submissions
Such a statement would have been more convincing had they started by denying GPLv3... a new
license for which there was really no compelling reason.
That was not the point of view of the creators of GPLv2, the license most often used in Free software. You will appreciate the fact that their opinion carries more weight than yours.
It is *not* the OSI's place to fight license proliferation.
They have stated
such a purpose in the past. A sure way to irrelevance is to express
a bunch of good wishes and then not come through with them. How about the first criterion to avoid said proliferation?
1. The license must not be duplicative
Why approve a license and then put in the category "Licenses that are redundant with more popular licenses (9)"?
(
Log in to post comments)