Who made Gentoo Linux, and when? A commit analysis

Since LWN has published statistics on who wrote the Linux kernel, I thought readers might also be interested in who's writing other major open-source projects. I recently obtained the entire CVS repository history for Gentoo Linux, courtesy of Robin Johnson <robbat2 -AT- gentoo -dot- org>. Although some of the code has moved to Subversion or Git recently so these numbers may not be 100% accurate, the techniques used to analyze commits should be generally useful in understanding the progress and contributors to any project.

First, I wanted to understand the developer community. How much experience do our developers have with Gentoo, and how has that changed over time? To do this, I created a number called "lifetime" that's the length of time between the developer's first and last commits. Then I scanned across each month, checking the average developer lifetime. I used the scanning month for the last commit of active developers to get the developer's experience at that time, not the developer's experience today.

What you can see is that the lifetimes go up roughly as a function of time since CVS history begins. This shows that the "average Gentoo developer" joins and stays involved for more than a year. Over a span of 3 years, the average lifetime increases from 1 year to 2 years.

Another way to look at this is to ask how many active and retired developers there are today as a function of when they gained commit access. The majority of active developers joined in 2005 and 2006, while the most retired developers joined in 2003 and 2004. This again shows that the average lifetime is around 2 years.

Developer counts at any given time is also of interest. I found this by scanning across months again, checking for how many developers the month is during their commit lifetimes.

The most interesting part is a sharp decline starting in early 2006. I wanted to attribute this in part to the addition of Subversion, which was right around that time, but that would only account for it if the developers commiting to Subversion no longer commited to CVS. That certainly isn't the case for more than 100 people, since the main package tree remains in CVS.

Instead, I now attribute this drop to Gentoo's developer population returning toward an equilibrium after an explosive, uncontrolled growth. The Gentoo structure and governance could not scale quickly enough to deal with all the new developers, but it took some time to normalize and continues to do so.

Now that we've learned something about our developers, how about our code? The next three graphs show commits per month to each CVS module. The "gentoo-x86" module contains all of the ebuilds (the packages). There's nothing particularly unusual about this, except for a huge peak in early 2006, I suspect when someone accidentally branched the entire repository. Interestingly, there isn't as much of a decline in commits as you might expect, given the drop in developers by more than a third. Apparently, the actively commiting developers weren't the ones who quit. The "gentoo" module contains the website files as well as some projects such as the installer and the Catalyst LiveCD creator as well as patchsets for more complex packages. The website is fairly stable at this point, and many of the projects in this repository have reached maturity, so development has slowed down. The "gentoo-src" module contains a number of projects as well, but the huge drop near the beginning of 2006 indicates a move of active development to Subversion.

And finally, let's tie the developers and the code together with a histogram. This shows the number of commits each developer's made, with a bin size of 100. You can see the incredibly long tail of the most active commiters, with most developers under 20,000 (note the scale) but the top developer at 120,000 commits.

Now let's take a closer look at the long tail of the developers with the largest commit counts. The tables show any developer with at least 1% of the total commits.

All-time commits
Developer	Percentage
Mike Frysinger	6.08
Chris White	4.72
Aron Griffis	4.34
Diego Pettenò	3.08
Robin H. Johnson	1.98
Michael Cummings	1.95
Michael Sterrett	1.80
Gustavo Zacarias	1.71
Jeremy Huddleston	1.64
Dan Armak	1.63
Seemant Kulleen	1.58
Markus Rothe	1.58
Daniel Robbins	1.54
Bryan Østergaard	1.47
Chris Gianelloni	1.28
Donnie Berkholz	1.15
Martin Holzer	1.03
Mamoru Komachi	1.01
Total	39.57

About 40% of the all-time commits to Gentoo come from just 18 developers. Unfortunately, I didn't have access to the size of the commits, just the number of them, so I couldn't try to rank them by changes in lines of code. One thing to be wary of is the very small commits, such as those indicating that a package works on a given architecture. But this list is not dominated by architecture developers.

2007 commits
Developer	Percentage
Raúl Porcel	6.60
Diego Pettenò	4.50
Mike Frysinger	3.91
Michael Sterrett	3.57
Piotr Jaroszynski	3.04
Christian Faulhammer	3.04
Gustavo Zacarias	2.97
Michael Cummings	2.62
Markus Rothe	2.52
Jeroen Roovers	2.25
Samuli Suominen	2.18
Markus Ullmann	1.98
Tobias Scherbaum	1.75
Petteri Räty	1.66
Chris Gianelloni	1.62
Steve Dibb	1.48
Andrej Kacian	1.45
Christian Heim	1.40
Marius Mauch	1.36
Christoph Mende	1.33
Bryan Østergaard	1.21
Donnie Berkholz	1.10
Gysbert Wassenaar	1.06
Roy Marples	1.03
Stefan Schweizer	1.03
Joseph Jezak	1.02
Total	57.68

In 2007 so far, 26 developers accounted for nearly 60% of commits. Unlike the all-time list, a significant fraction of these developers are architecture developers, including the top commiter.

This analysis was mostly automated, using a combination of awk, bash shell, Python and gnuplot. The scripts are available upon request to the author <dberkholz -AT- gentoo -dot- org>.

Index entries for this article
GuestArticles	Berkholz, Donnie

---

to post comments