| |||||||||||||
SMACK meets the One True Security ModuleSMACK meets the One True Security ModulePosted Oct 3, 2007 0:29 UTC (Wed) by drag (subscriber, #31333)In reply to: SMACK meets the One True Security Module by flewellyn Parent article: SMACK meets the One True Security Module
Well I think the point behind Eclispe is that it's a framework for building IDEs and what IDE you get when you try it out is only going to have a tiny fraction of it's capabilties.
Er, something like that.
Personally I'm happy with Vim and Python. No need for intellesense or anything like that for a language that is designed to be easy to remember and I am not working in a formal corporate environment. (I'll probably just program in C or pyrex or something like that if I need speed)
(Log in to post comments)
SMACK meets the One True Security Module Posted Oct 3, 2007 3:23 UTC (Wed) by drag (subscriber, #31333) [Link] OMG, I can't beleive I posted the above to teh wrong article.WTF was I thinking.
:(
SMACK meets the One True Security Module Posted Oct 4, 2007 0:09 UTC (Thu) by jamesm (guest, #2273) [Link] Oddly enough, it still makes sense here :-)
Thanks to Drag replying to wrong article, I just had a bright idea Posted Oct 5, 2007 9:18 UTC (Fri) by pr1268 (subscriber, #24648) [Link] Agreed! Drag's comment about his "IDE" of vim and python vs. Eclipse did indeed bear some resemblance to the discussion about SELinux vs. AppArmour. What a pleasantly surreal experience! Thanks to Drag's misplaced comment, I just had a bright idea: Eclipse IDE for SELinux!! Use all the features you've come to expect with using Eclipse to develop Java, C, or C++... and now you can build your own security framework! Testing your framework is simply a few mouse clicks away via the "build/debug" menu. </end silliness> ;-)
Thanks to Drag replying to wrong article, I just had a bright idea Posted Oct 5, 2007 14:07 UTC (Fri) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] Obviously the *right* approach is an Emacs specialized entirely for writing SELinux configurations. There's even an XEmacs fork with the right name: SXEmacs. Just reuse the name, write a new selinux mode, rip out all that boring stuff nobody uses like text-mode, cc-mode, vm and gnus, and you're home free! :)
Thanks to Drag replying to wrong article, I just had a bright idea Posted Dec 11, 2008 18:22 UTC (Thu) by SEJeff (subscriber, #51588) [Link]
Does it have vim bindings? *runs and hides*
|
|||||||||||||