What should they have done?
Posted Sep 28, 2007 4:50 UTC (Fri) by apollock
Parent article: GPL enforcement: waiting for the Monsoon
I'm curious, in the case of BusyBox, what should Monsoon have done in order to have done the right thing? BusyBox isn't something you link against (at least as far as I understand it) so would they just have to have provided BusyBox source code (+ any modifications they made, I guess)?
But assuming they made no changes to BusyBox at all, would they just have had to provide the BusyBox source code they built from?
to post comments)