| |||||||||||||
Reviving linux-tinyReviving linux-tinyPosted Sep 27, 2007 14:17 UTC (Thu) by kjp (subscriber, #39639)Parent article: Reviving linux-tiny
I dont understand why, for the majority of printk's where the format string is a literal, the compiler couldn't do a compile time check for the <Severity> code and decide whether or not to generate code for it.
I do similar things and it has worked for ages with gcc.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||