By Jake Edge
September 19, 2007
Mozilla has made its decision and will be spinning off Thunderbird
into a new organization. Back in August, we covered a discussion about the
future of the Thunderbird project, which was spawned by a series of
postings in the blog of Mitchell Baker, CEO of
Mozilla Corp. At that time, it was recognized that Thunderbird was
suffering from a lack of attention, mostly because of an intense focus on
Firefox. This week, Baker announced
that the results of that discussion were to start a new for-profit company
to nurture Thunderbird.
The new company, as yet unnamed and referred to as "MailCo", will start
with three million dollars in seed money from Mozilla. The intent is to
use that money to hire a small team to foster email and internet
communications through Thunderbird. To that end, they have
hired David Ascher, currently CTO at ActiveState, as the CEO of the new
company.
Ascher also posted a blog entry
about the new organization, providing some insights into the role of
MailCo:
While it will legally be a for-profit company, its purpose will be to serve
the public benefit. This means that while part of my job is to figure out a
long-term sustainability plan for the company, It's more important for me to
make email better than to generate significant profits. If profits happen,
that's fine, but generating profits at the expense of the public benefit is
not. It will be fascinating to figure out what that means in practice.
The biggest job for Ascher and MailCo will be to determine what, exactly,
Thunderbird should be. From the comments on Baker's blog and elsewhere, it
is clear that there is no consensus on what an email client should and
should not do. There are many constituencies; trying to please them all is
likely to please none.
There are lots of questions about integration of email with other internet
services: instant messages, RSS feeds, VoIP, etc. There are also questions
of local vs. remote message storage and web vs. host-based clients. Each
has its advantages and disadvantages along with a vocal set of users. If
MailCo starts moving in a particular direction, to the detriment of
supporting others, they may lose some significant portion of their
[PULL QUOTE:
While profit may not be a requirement, some kind of potentially
sustainable business model will probably have to be established.
END QUOTE]
user base. But a decision will have to be made in order to concentrate
their efforts; it will be hard to find the right balance.
While profit may not be a requirement, some kind of potentially
sustainable business model will probably have to be established. It is
hard to imagine that Mozilla will keep pumping money into the company,
though Baker makes it clear that they will consider further investment.
Thunderbird does not have the obvious 'sell eyes to Google' model that
Firefox has so successfully used; it directly competes with Google and
other, similar, ad-supported mail sites.
For various reasons, Thunderbird has never had a large development community in
the way that Firefox or other free software projects do. There is a core
group of developers, presumably strong candidates to be hired on at MailCo,
but in order for the project to succeed, it will need a bigger army of
volunteers. There can be friction between paid developers and volunteers,
especially if the volunteers feel like they aren't being heard. Growing
and working with the
development
community will be an important part of MailCo's first year or two.
Many folks point to the stagnation of the main competition, Outlook, and liken it to
the situation, several years back, with Firefox and Internet Explorer. There are some
similarities, but there is also one big difference: Exchange. It is
relatively easy for a user to change their desktop applications, even in a
controlled workplace environment, but companies are unlikely to toss
out their Exchange servers anytime soon. Because Microsoft completely
controls the mail client to Exchange server protocol, Thunderbird will have
a hard time being a drop-in replacement, in the way that Firefox is. One
possibility would be
to work with Openchange or similar Exchange
replacement projects to provide an end-to-end solution for the enterprise.
Obviously there are some challenges ahead, for email clients in general
and for Thunderbird in particular, but there is reason for optimism as
well. Many did not expect Firefox to achieve the level of adoption that it
has – it has made remarkable inroads against an entrenched competitor
– and many of the same folks are behind the effort to give
Thunderbird a push. Though it may seem like Mozilla is
kicking Thunderbird out of the nest, they are actually giving it some
resources so that it has a chance to fly. It certainly will not suffer under an
organization devoted solely to its development.
(
Log in to post comments)