|
And?And?Posted Aug 28, 2007 21:05 UTC (Tue) by renox (guest, #23785)In reply to: Securing our votes by rgmoore Parent article: Securing our votes
>>I don't agree. Accessibility to all voters is critical.
Sure, but security is also critical, secrecy is also critical, etc.
>> A voter who can't cast a ballot has been disenfranchised.
That's not true, if a voter cannot cast a ballot alone, he can still vote if you authorise him to have a helper or someone which can cast a vote for him, of course this possibility also gives the possibility of buying votes, it's a tradeoff.
>>Any system that systematically disenfranchises a predictable subset of voters is irretrievably flawed.
Then all the systems are 'irretrievably flawed', what's your point?
(Log in to post comments)
|
Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
Powered by Rackspace Managed Hosting.