| |||||||||||||
US District court says that the artistic license is a contractUS District court says that the artistic license is a contractPosted Aug 25, 2007 8:39 UTC (Sat) by bojan (subscriber, #14302)In reply to: US District court says that the artistic license is a contract by bojan Parent article: US District court says that the artistic license is a contract
> So, it is inherent in copyright law that "do not change copyright notice" is by definition within the "scope of the licence".
I meant this in the sense that by removing copyright notice here, author's rights from 106(a) have been infringed.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||