Knoppix was not the first [LWN.net]

Knoppix was not the first

Posted Aug 18, 2007 9:49 UTC (Sat) by csawtell (subscriber, #986)
In reply to: Knoppix was not the first by giraffedata
Parent article: The anatomy of a Linux distribution

Yggdrasil did indeed run from the CD, but 'run' took on the meaning of 'demonstrate slowly'. It was effective in that one could see what you were going to get before you installed the package. I used the Fall-95 release for quite a while and was most disappointed when it withered away and died.
I think I've still got the disk somewhere, I'm almost tempted to spin it up on modern hardware just to see what happens.

(Log in to post comments)

Knoppix was not the first

Posted Aug 21, 2007 4:54 UTC (Tue) by roelofs (subscriber, #2599) [Link]

I think I've still got the disk somewhere, I'm almost tempted to spin it up on modern hardware just to see what happens.

I'm not sure I have an Yggdrasil CD (though I still have some MCC floppies...), but I did try booting Knoppix ca. 2003 on a 1995 Pentium 166(?) and 32 MB of RAM. Whoo boy, what a mistake... Took 20 minutes to boot and pretty much thrashed continuously no matter what one tried. :-)

Old distros on modern hardware tend not to fare too well simply because they don't recognize much (any?) of the hardware. When the original distros came out, ISA/EISA/VLB were king, and USB didn't exist; now it's all PCI/PCI-x/AGP/USB2--i.e., most of your basic I/O may not show up, which makes interactions...difficult. ;-) Of course, if it does boot, it should scream... (I still occasionally boot a 16MB Pentium-75 laptop running Slackware 3.4, I think. It's quite usable.)

Greg