| |||||||||||||
timerfd() and system call reviewtimerfd() and system call reviewPosted Aug 17, 2007 17:40 UTC (Fri) by giraffedata (subscriber, #1954)In reply to: timerfd() and system call review by nix Parent article: timerfd() and system call review
I agree. If you have a "We're not committed to this and don't stand behind it yet" status, things stay in that status a long time and then there's no distinction between function in that status and not. I think it should be like the 5-second rule for reclaiming food dropped on the floor. You have one release to change your mind and redo a user interface before it becomes set in stone. The effectiveness of that would depend entirely upon how well the rule can be communicated to users.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||