| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
The SCO Group: we're not dead yetThe SCO Group: we're not dead yetPosted Aug 13, 2007 15:15 UTC (Mon) by allesfresser (subscriber, #216)Parent article: The SCO Group: we're not dead yet
Perhaps some garlic, silver bullets, and/or wooden stakes are in order?
(Log in to post comments)
The SCO Group: we're not dead yet Posted Aug 13, 2007 15:24 UTC (Mon) by mbottrell (guest, #43008) [Link] Think they are branded IBM/Buffy. The stakes have well and truly been sharpened... the gun loaded, and the garlic is hanging.
SCO is likely to dive into that swimming pool of Holy Water whilst backing away from IBM.
What's sad, the way this is going IBM/Novell will find SCO goes under before they can pay out their losses.
It will be interesting after all the wash just 'how involved' Microsoft has been throughout the whole crusade. Where does this actually leave Microsoft Unix Services for Windows?
The SCO Group: we're not dead yet Posted Aug 13, 2007 15:34 UTC (Mon) by gouyou (subscriber, #30290) [Link] Where does this actually leave Microsoft Unix Services for Windows? In the same place as OpenSolaris, not moved at all. They purchased the right to some Unix IP, SCO was an authorized reseller of Unix IP, so the trouble between SCO and Novell doesn't really concern them, at least for this bit.
The SCO Group: we're not dead yet Posted Aug 14, 2007 5:48 UTC (Tue) by remijnj (subscriber, #5838) [Link] Seems to be taken care of:
(wait 30 seconds for the nag strip to go away)
Check out the Aug. 15 strip Posted Aug 16, 2007 4:55 UTC (Thu) by pr1268 (subscriber, #24648) [Link] It's a variation of the Aug. 13 strip, but I won't spoil it any further. Suffice it to say I laughed. A lot.
|
|
||||||||||||