Not logged in
Log in now
Create an account
Subscribe to LWN
LWN.net Weekly Edition for December 5, 2013
Deadline scheduling: coming soon?
LWN.net Weekly Edition for November 27, 2013
ACPI for ARM?
LWN.net Weekly Edition for November 21, 2013
Merging upstream has to be done with SystemTap too. Is there any reason why it would be harder with a dtrace clone?
And patent trouble has not stopped kernel developers before...
Posted Aug 11, 2007 20:53 UTC (Sat) by fuhchee (subscriber, #40059)
Not as much as one might think. Systemtap relies only on existing
externalized kernel interfaces and hooks - no changes just on our
account. That's not to say it wouldn't be nice to get some extra
interfaces/hooks, or to offload some version drift maintenance to other
folks. It means that we can work toward their development and upstream
inclusion gradually, without blocking the rest of the work.
Posted Aug 11, 2007 22:09 UTC (Sat) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313)
the license and patent status of dtrace is very much a reason for it not being considered (in fact, due to these issues most of the kernel developers don't even look at it to avoid any accusations of them being tainted)
Posted Aug 12, 2007 12:13 UTC (Sun) by man_ls (guest, #15091)
Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds