| |||||||||||
i386 and x86_64: back together?i386 and x86_64: back together?Posted Aug 2, 2007 16:31 UTC (Thu) by jpick (subscriber, #29470)Parent article: i386 and x86_64: back together?
Merge'em. It may be more pain for the developers, but this affects millions of users.
(Log in to post comments)
i386 and x86_64: back together? Posted Aug 2, 2007 19:44 UTC (Thu) by proski (subscriber, #104) [Link] The whole point of merging is to make it less pain for the developers.
i386 and x86_64: back together? Posted Aug 7, 2007 14:28 UTC (Tue) by im14u2c (subscriber, #5246) [Link] It sounds like it's both: It's probably more short term pain for more long term advantage.
i386 and x86_64: back together? Posted Sep 10, 2007 4:42 UTC (Mon) by k8to (subscriber, #15413) [Link] How does this affect users at all beyond the code quality issues that the developers also care about?
It's not like the issue is visible from userspace.
i386 and x86_64: back together? Posted Oct 14, 2007 2:57 UTC (Sun) by ojbyer@usa.net (subscriber, #41909) [Link] How does this affect users at all beyond the code quality issues that the developers also care about?When I install a new kernel version, all my machines will use the same file name for the image: /usr/src/linux/arch/x86/boot/bzImage Not very signifigant, I agree, but still a userspace-visible change.
|
|||||||||||