LWN.net Logo

Advertisement

Advanced thin client solution for Linux, based on Open Source. Mix Windows and Linux, 10 licenses for free!

Advertise here

So why did Apple need CUPS?

So why did Apple need CUPS?

Posted Jul 26, 2007 14:58 UTC (Thu) by ofeeley (subscriber, #36105)
Parent article: Apple buys cups

What is Apple replacing with CUPS? I hear a lot of propaganda about how OS X is simple to use compared to GNU/Linux and how Free Software sucks in usability terms, so how come Apple didn't develop a superior situation in-house?

Or are they buying reverse-engineered, hand-created, community originated PPDs which they'll slot into their own framework?


(Log in to post comments)

So why did Apple need CUPS?

Posted Jul 31, 2007 10:29 UTC (Tue) by dr_lha (guest, #86) [Link]

The simple answer to this is that the current Mac OS X printing subsystem is CUPS, and a fairly vanilla version at that. Apple basically have just bought the rights to the solution they already use in house.

Most of the Unix stuff in Mac OS X is the same stuff you use on Linux, it just has a pretty front end to make things easy (much like, for example, KDE implements a pretty front end to CUPS).

Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds